@misc{Senderek_Tomasz_Effectiveness_2014,
 author={Senderek, Tomasz},
 address={Kraków},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2014},
 school={Uniwersytet Jagielloński. Collegium Medicum. Wydział Lekarski.},
 language={pol},
 abstract={Ablation is one of non-pharmacological treatment modalities in arrhythmias. The aim of the work is to compare the effectiveness of ad-hoc, intraprocedural and late RF ablation of left or right ventricular arrhythmia and to compare the methods used to identify and ablate arrhythmia substrate with CARTO system, pacemapping and CARTO with pacemapping. In one-year follow up, the ablation success rate depending on arrhythmia substrate localization system used was as follows: 1. CARTO: 78,4%; 2. Pacemaping: 78,3%; 3. CARTO + pacemaping: 84,1%. Fromthe analyzed variables, only ablation temperature and energy affected long-term therapy effect significantly (p<0.05). Improvement of hemodynamic myocardial function after ventricular arrhythmia ablation was demonstrated. Following successful procedure, there was average increase of left ventricle ejection fraction from 51.4% to 58.6%. Classic RF ablation with pacemapping electrode localization is effective and safe, therefore it can be considered as first-line therapy},
 title={Effectiveness of RF ablation of ventricular ectopic beats from the right and (or) left ventricle and comparison methods used to identify and ablate arrhythmia substrate},
 type={Praca doktorska},
 keywords={ablationRF, carto, pacemapping, PVC, VEB},
}