Search for: [Abstract = "up II\: scatter correction versus without scatter correction \(SC vs wSC\) – subgroup 1\:24%vs15%\; subgroup 2\:71%vs61%. The observed differences were not statistically significant for each investigated subgroups in group II. The quantitative assessment\-Group I\:the mean value of SC\/wSC ratio in subgroups 1 and 2 was\:1,25±0,57 and 1,21±0,59, respectively. Group II\:1,32±0,98 and 1,27±0,79, respectively. Phase 4–The qualitative assessment–the most effectively Gauss filter setting was FWHM=4 and 8\[mm\] \(p<0,05\). The percentage of the lesions assessed as 1 for group I and II was\:22% and 17% \(subgroup 1\), respectively\; 71% and 79% \(subgroup 2\), respectively. The quantitative assessment\-for the FWHM=4\[mm\] was the highest value of TCS\/TCB ratio\:group I\:2,39±0,46 \(subgroup 1\) and 2,71±0,64 \(subgroup 2\) and group II\:2,17±0,60 and 2,84±0,84, respectively. Phase 5–The qualitative assessment–the results of the lesions visibility assessment in comparison of two techniques of reconstruction OSEM versus FBP in both groups I and II were–subgroup 1\:31%vs8% and 15%vs10%, respectively and subgroup 2\:54%vs11% and 82%vs42%, respectively. Differences in quality assessment of SPECT images in subgroup 1 \(group II\) were not statistically significant. The quantitative assessment–the mean value of TCS\/TCB ratio was 1,5 times higher for optimized setting OSEM\(8,10\) with applied SC versus FBP"]

Number of results: 1