Search for: [Abstract = "trategies for mitigating the limitations of rTMS, such as combining it with neuroimaging techniques and incorporating appropriate control conditions. It concludes that the strength of inferences drawn from rTMS studies largely depends on the experimental design, and rTMS may not always be suitable for answering questions related to causality. This article is intended for researchers aiming to design rTMS studies or interpret the results of rTMS studies causally. The second article investigates the involvement of the PFC in the processes underlying visual awareness. While some theories of consciousness highlight the importance of the PFC as the neural underpinning of visual awareness \(e.g., higher\-order theories of consciousness\), a number of researchers argue that PFC activity is not essential. It has also been hypothesised that the PFC is closely associated with metacognition. Therefore, the first study investigated the role of the PFC in visual awareness judgements by comparing three different rTMS protocols applied to the left anterior medial prefrontal cortex \(aMPFC\), a brain area associated with metacognition, to induce plasticity\-like effects. The study employed three distinct Theta Burst Stimulation \(TBS\) protocols, namely continuous TBS \(cTBS\), intermittent TBS \(iTBS\), and sham TBS. The TBS protocol was applied prior to the behavioural testing involving"]

Number of results: 1