Search for: [Abstract = "rials. These studies therefore influence further development of the tested interventions, even if they do not contribute to the marketing approval. The studies included in the analysis, were also widely cited by a variety of primary research articles from other fields of biomedical science. The cross\-sectional analysis of clinical trials with pediatric population, conducted in Polish academic medical centers, showed that the percentage of trials that publish results is relatively high. However, the results of only half of the published studies were made available online or in the form of a publication within 2 years of the study end, i.e. in line with the current requirements. This reduces the social value of these trials – if they are not published quickly enough, they have no chance of contributing to the advancement of science. In the theoretical articles included in this dissertation I propose solutions to strengthen the system of prospective evaluation of newly proposed clinical trials. These solutions could replace the current standards, contribute to the elimination of research waste and thus increase the social value of research done in pediatrics. I also outline that even if various pediatric studies show little direct benefit \(clinical value\) to the participant, without them it would be impossible to develop many fields of biomedical science and raise public awareness"]

Number of results: 1