Search for: [Abstract = "points, 63 and 53 respectively. The biggest numbers of 24 patients showed the good results \(37,1%\), the smallest number of 10 patients showed the excellent results \(15,4%\). Excellent and very good results were observed in 25 patients \(38,4%\). For the radiological assessment the Rasmussen classification was used. Overall analysis based on this scale showed the following results in the two groups of patients \(group with and with not \; implant removal\) according to the fracture type\:Combined analysis of Rasmussen classification in both groups showed the following results\:\- in the type I fracture there were 6 excellent results \(9,4%\) and 2 very good \(3,1%\) with mean point values of 15 and 13 respectively. \- in the type II fractures there were 6 excellent results \(9,4%\), 7 very good \(10,8%\) and 1 good result \(1,6%\) . The mean point values were 15 points, 13 and 11 respectively. \- in the type III fractures there were 3 excellent results \(4,7%\), 7 very good \(10,8%\) and 5 good result \(7,8%\). The mean point values were 15 points, 13 and 10 respectively. \- in the type IV fractures there was 1 excellent result \(1,6%\), 3 very good \(4,7%\), 5 good \(7,8%\) and 1 bad result \(1,6%\). The mean point values were 15 points, 13, 10 and 7 respectively. \- in the type V fracture there was only 6 good results \(9,4 %\) with the mean point values of 10. \- in the type VI fracture there was 1 excellent \(1,6%"]

Number of results: 1