Search for: [Abstract = "fter 3 months only in the EC\/electroablation group \(p\-0.023\). After 6 months, ultrasound showed a high percentage \(39%\) of relapses for the group treated with EC\/ CO2 laser ablation, while in the EC\/electroablation group it was 17%. It has been shown that ablative techniques brought the envisaged therapeutic effect in the treatment of only some types of pain related to pelvic endometriosis. Neither studied technique had a long\-term therapeutic effect for pain connected with DIE \(deep infiltrating endometriosis\), showing that the low invasiveness of the mentioned ablative techniques is ineffective in the treatment of deeply\-infiltrating endometriosis and should not be used as standard. This statement particularly concerns CO2 laser ablation after which ultrasound indicated a high number of endometric relapses, and for which a correlation between their occurrence and the intensification of dyschesis symptoms was observed. Application of the discussed methods in treatment of menstrual pain, which is primarily associated with the occurrence of superficial, and possibly also ovarian endometriosis, could be considered. CO2 laser ablation and electroablation techniques find application in ovarian endometriosis treatment in respect to ovarian reserve preservation. The combination of ablative methods with the recommended classical technique of cyst removal kept the AFC at an unchange"]
