Search for: [Abstract = "fracture. The most common cause of the fracture were the motor vehicle accidents – in 29 cases \(44,5%\), the less common \- in 11 \(17%\) patients – the fall down on the same level or the height less than 1,5. All the patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation using the lag screws and buttress plates. In 4 \(2 males and 2 females\) cases the initial knee arthroscopy was performed before the internal fixation. In 8 cases \(12,3%\) the allogenic bone graft was used in addition to internal fixation.. The final follow up was performed 3 months after implant removal in this group of patients and 6 months after surgery in the group where implants were not removed. For the radiological assessment the Rasmussen \[39\] classification was used and for the functional one – the HSS scale with Golec and Nowak \[40\] modification. The complication were evaluated in the postoperative period, 3 months after implant removal in this group of patients and 6 months after internal fixation in the group where implant was not removed. The statistical analysis with Statistica program was performed. Results\:Overall analysis based on the HSS scale with Golec and Nowak \[40\] modification showed the following results in the two groups of patients \(group with and with not implant removal\) according to the fracture type\:Combined analysis of both groups showed the results as follows\:\- in the type I fracture there were 4 excellent results \(6,2%\), 3 very good \(4,7%\), and good in 2 cases \(3,1%\). The mean point values were 88 points, 81 and 63 for the excellent, very good and good results respectively. \- in the type II fractures there were 4 excellent results \(6,2%\), 5 very good \(7,8%\), good in 4 cases \(6,2%\) and in 1 patients – bad result \(1,6%\). The mean point values were 86 points, 76, 63 and 58 for the excellent, very good, good and bad results respectively. \- in the type III fracture there was 1 excellent result \(1,6%\), 5 very good \(7,8%\), good in 6 cases \(9,4%\) and 2 bad result \(3,1%\). The mean point values were 87 points, 74, 63 and 55 for the excellent, very good, good and bad results respectively. \- in the type IV fracture there was 1 excellent result \(1,6%\), 1 very good \(1,6%\), good in 5 cases \(7,8%\) and 3 bad result \(4,7%\). The mean point values were 87 points, 73, 63 and 55 for the excellent, very good, good and bad results respectively. \- in the type V fracture there was only 5 bad results \(7,8%\) with the mean point values of 55. \- in the type VI fracture there was 1 very good result \(1,6%\), 6 good \(9,4%\) and 5 bad result \(7,8%\) with the mean point values of 70 points, 63 and 53 respectively. The biggest numbers of 24 patients showed the good results \(37,1%\), the smallest number of 10 patients showed the excellent results \(15,4%\). Excellent and very good results were observed in 25 patients \(38,4%\). For the radiological assessment the Rasmussen classification was used. Overall analysis based on this scale showed the following results in the two groups of patients \(group with and with not"]

Number of results: 0