Search for: [Abstract = "d the following results in the two groups of patients \(group with and with not implant removal\) according to the fracture type\:Combined analysis of both groups showed the results as follows\:\- in the type I fracture there were 4 excellent results \(6,2%\), 3 very good \(4,7%\), and good in 2 cases \(3,1%\). The mean point values were 88 points, 81 and 63 for the excellent, very good and good results respectively. \- in the type II fractures there were 4 excellent results \(6,2%\), 5 very good \(7,8%\), good in 4 cases \(6,2%\) and in 1 patients – bad result \(1,6%\). The mean point values were 86 points, 76, 63 and 58 for the excellent, very good, good and bad results respectively. \- in the type III fracture there was 1 excellent result \(1,6%\), 5 very good \(7,8%\), good in 6 cases \(9,4%\) and 2 bad result \(3,1%\). The mean point values were 87 points, 74, 63 and 55 for the excellent, very good, good and bad results respectively. \- in the type IV fracture there was 1 excellent result \(1,6%\), 1 very good \(1,6%\), good in 5 cases \(7,8%\) and 3 bad result \(4,7%\). The mean point values were 87 points, 73, 63 and 55 for the excellent, very good, good and bad results respectively. \- in the type V fracture there was only 5 bad results \(7,8%\) with the mean point values of 55. \- in the type VI fracture there was 1 very good result \(1,6%\), 6 good \(9,4%\) and 5 bad result \(7,8%\) with the mean point values of 70"]

Number of results: 1