Search for: [Abstract = "d level, which is the most important indication of ovarian reserve. In addition, no increase of FSH was noted. Any increase could mean a diminished ovarian reserve. It was shown that use of EC\/electroablation causes a lower BOV, while EC\/CO2 laser ablation resulted in a higher number of relapses, as found by follow up ultrasound examination, and a lower percentage of pregnancies. The electrical power used during bipolar electroablation \(60\-70 Wat\) is likely to be too high and causes greater destruction of ovarian tissue than with CO2 laser ablation. Whilst the power of the laser beam \(10\-20 Wat\) allows for better precision and less destruction of the ovarian cortex, it is too weak to remove endometrial cyst tissue completely which results in a high number of relapses. Therefore it seems advisable to modify the parameters of ablative techniques in order to preserve the ovarian reserve and diminish the relapse percentage. These results lead to the conclusion that none of the studied methods may be seen as optimal and application of these methods should be chosen individually."]
