Search for: [Abstract = "cteristics of the socio \-demographic and medical. Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS.ResultsMore than half of the respondents assessed the overall quality of life and satisfaction with their health status at a good or very good level. The lowest was functioning in somatic \(physical\) domain \(average 13,035 ± 1,549\) and psychological domain \(mean 13,040 ± 1,100\), the best functioning was evaluated in social relationships domain \(mean 15,044 ± 2,404\). There was a statistically significant difference between distributions of domain of QOL. There was a statistically significant, positive relationship between sense of coherence, dispositional optimism, self\-efficacy, social support and positive coping strategies quality of life in all domains and negative between depression, perceived stress and negative coping strategies and quality of life. Univariate regression analysis showed that psychological variables explain the quality of life in all domain. In model of the determinants of quality of life, it was found that the sense of coherence, levels of stress, coping strategies\: self\-blame as well as self –distraction and actually received support, have the greatest impact on the quality of life of the population, explaining 63.4 % of the variance of the dependent variable. For social domain, determinants were senses of coherence, depression, positive reframing, actually receiv"]

Number of results: 1