Search for: [Abstract = "The baseline examination included\: best corrected visual acuity with Snellen’s charts, intraocular pressure with Goldmann applanation tonometer, corneal pachymetry, assessment of irideocorneal angle with Goldmann indirect goniolens \(gonioscopy\), slit\-lamp examination of a anterior part of an eye, fundoscopy with the volk lens after pupil dilation with 1% Tropicamide eye grops, visual field testing 30\-2 with Humphrey statistic perimeter, examination of the optic nerve head with Heidelberg Retina Tomograph and optic disc photography taken with Topcon TRC\-50DX camera. The photographies of the optic nerve head were evaluated by two independent specialists of glaucomatous neuropathy. They knew the chronology of the photographies but they did not know then patients data. If a case of dcontrary opinions on the same photography in terms of glaucomatous neuropathy progression, the final opinion was given by the third independent observer. Additional evaluation of the photography of the optic nerve disc was neccessary in only few cases. The results of the study were analysed statisticaly. The values of mean deviation \(MD\) parameter of the visual field showed significant statistical defferences between the investigated group and the control group. Patients diagnosed for glaucoma demonstrated characterstic, glaucomateous defects in the visual field, resulting in lower values \(\-6,513dB\) of MD as compared to the control group \(\-0,110 dB\). During the observation, no considerable statistic change of MD parameter in the patients group with glaucoma was determined. The lack of statistically important dicrease of MD parameter indicates no progression in the visual field in this group. Apart from height variation contour and RNFL \(retinal"]

Number of results: 0